Two-Way Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA)
Two-Way Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA)
Two-way MANOVA is a statistical technique used to analyze the effects of two independent variables on a set of dependent variables. It is an extension of the one-way MANOVA, which only considers the effect of a single independent variable.
Purpose:
To determine whether two or more independent variables have a significant effect on a set of related dependent variables.
Assumptions:
Dependent variables are multivariate normal.
Independent variables are categorical.
Homogeneity of variances-covariance matrices.
Independence of observations.
Procedure:
1. Formulate hypotheses:
Null hypothesis: There is no effect of any independent variable on the dependent variables.
Alternative hypothesis: There is an effect of at least one independent variable on the dependent variables.
2. Calculate Wilk's lambda:
A measure of association between the independent variables and the dependent variables, ranging from 0 to 1.
A smaller lambda indicates a stronger relationship.
3. Test the hypotheses:
Calculate the F-statistic using Wilk's lambda.
Compare the F-statistic to the critical F-value with degrees of freedom determined by the number of independent variables and the number of dependent variables.
4. Interpret the results:
If the F-statistic is significant, reject the null hypothesis and conclude that at least one independent variable has an effect on the dependent variables.
If the F-statistic is not significant, fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is no evidence of an effect.
Univariate Analysis:
After conducting the overall MANOVA, follow-up univariate analyses (e.g., ANOVAs or t-tests) can be performed to determine which specific dependent variables contribute to the significant MANOVA result.
Advantages:
Considers the relationships among multiple dependent variables simultaneously.
Controls for type I error inflation when multiple dependent variables are analyzed.
Limitations:
Assumes multivariate normality, which may not always hold in practice.
Interpretation of results can be complex when there are multiple independent variables.
Example 1:
Suppose a researcher is interested in examining the effects of two independent variables (gender and education level) on four dependent variables (attitude towards climate change, environmental knowledge, pro-environmental behavior, and environmental concern).
Variables:
Independent variables:
Gender (male, female)
Education level (high school, college graduate, graduate degree)
Dependent variables (measured on a continuous scale):
Attitude towards climate change
Environmental knowledge
Pro-environmental behavior
Environmental concern
Procedure:
1. Check assumptions: Check assumptions such as normality, linearity, homogeneity of variance, and independence.
2. Conduct two-way MANOVA: Enter gender, education level, and their interaction as independent variables into the MANOVA model. The dependent variables will be the four scores for each participant.
3. Interpret the results:
Overall significance: Determine the overall significance of the MANOVA model using Wilks' lambda or Pillai's trace.
Main effects: Examine the significance of each independent variable (gender and education level) on the set of dependent variables.
Interaction effect: Check for the interaction effect between gender and education level on the dependent variables.
Example output:
Overall significance:
Wilks' lambda = 0.85, p = 0.005
Main effects:
Gender: F(4, 200) = 3.2, p = 0.05
Education level: F(8, 400) = 4.8, p < 0.001
Interaction effect:
Gender x Education level: F(8, 400) = 2.1, p = 0.05
Interpretation:
The overall model is significant, indicating that at least one independent variable has a significant effect on the set of dependent variables.
Gender has a significant main effect, suggesting that there are differences in environmental attitudes, knowledge, behavior, and concern between males and females.
Education level also has a significant main effect, indicating that individuals with higher education levels have more positive environmental attitudes, knowledge, and behavior.
There is a significant interaction effect between gender and education level, suggesting that the effects of gender vary depending on education level.
Example 2:
Hypotheses:
Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no difference in glycemic control (HbA1c) between the treatment and control groups.
Alternative Hypothesis (Ha): There is a difference in glycemic control (HbA1c) between the treatment and control groups.
Design:
Independent Variable: Treatment group (experimental vs. control)
Dependent Variables: Glycemic control (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose (FBG), postprandial blood glucose (PPG)
Procedure:
1. Recruitment of participants: Subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus were randomly assigned to either the treatment group (received a new medication) or the control group (received placebo).
2. Data collection: HbA1c, FBG, and PPG were measured at baseline and at regular intervals during the study period.
3. Statistical analysis: Two-way MANOVA was performed to analyze the effects of the treatment group on the dependent variables, controlling for baseline values.
Results:
The MANOVA results indicated that there was a significant interaction between the treatment group and time (p < 0.05).
Univariate Tests:
HbA1c: The treatment group had significantly lower HbA1c levels than the control group at all follow-up time points (p < 0.05).
FBG: The treatment group had significantly lower FBG levels than the control group at most follow-up time points (p < 0.05).
PPG: There were no significant differences in PPG levels between the treatment and control groups (p > 0.05).
Conclusion:
The two-way MANOVA and univariate tests demonstrate that the new medication was effective in improving glycemic control (HbA1c and FBG) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Example 3:
Research Question:
To determine the effects of two different diabetes medications (M1 and M2) and two different doses (low and high) on three measures of glycemic control (HbA1c, fasting glucose, and postprandial glucose) in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Independent Variables:
• Medication (M1, M2)
• Dose (low, high)
Dependent Variables:
• HbA1c
• Fasting glucose
• Postprandial glucose
Design:
Two-way MANOVA with three dependent variables (glycemic control measures) and two independent variables (medication and dose).
Procedure:
1. Randomly assign patients with type 2 diabetes to receive either medication M1 or M2 at either a low or high dose.
2. Monitor patients' glycemic control measures (HbA1c, fasting glucose, and postprandial glucose) at baseline and after a specific treatment period.
3. Collect data on glycemic control measures for each patient under each condition.
4. Perform a two-way MANOVA to analyze the effects of medication, dose, and their interaction on glycemic control.
Analysis:
The MANOVA will test the following hypotheses:
• Main effects:
* Medication: Are there significant differences in glycemic control between medications M1 and M2?
* Dose: Are there significant differences in glycemic control between low and high doses?
• Interaction: Is there a significant interaction between medication and dose, indicating that the effect of one variable depends on the level of the other?
Interpretation:
• If the main effect of medication is significant, it indicates that there is an overall difference in glycemic control between medications M1 and M2.
• If the main effect of dose is significant, it indicates that there is an overall difference in glycemic control between low and high doses.
• If the interaction between medication and dose is significant, it indicates that the effect of medication on glycemic control depends on the dose used.
Example Results:
• Medication main effect: F(1, 60) = 15.2, p < 0.001 (significant)
• Dose main effect: F(1, 60) = 10.5, p < 0.01 (significant)
• Medication x Dose interaction: F(1, 60) = 3.8, p < 0.05 (significant)
Conclusion:
The results of the two-way MANOVA indicate that both medication and dose have significant effects on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes, and that there is a significant interaction between the two variables. This suggests that the choice of medication and dose should be individualized based on the patient's specific needs and response to treatment.
......................................................................................................
👉 For the data analysis, please go to my Youtube(Ads) channel to Watch Video (Video Link) in
Youtube Channel (Channel Link) and Download(Ads) video.
💗 Thanks to Subscribe(channel) and Click(channel) on bell 🔔 to get more videos!💗!!
- Tell: (+855) - 96 810 0024
- Telegram: https://t.me/sokchea_yann
- Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/CambodiaBiostatistics/
- TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@sokcheayann999
- STATA for dataset restructuring, descriptive and analytical data analysis
- SPSS for dataset restructuring, data entry, data check, descriptive, and analytical data analysis
- Epi-Info for building questionnaires, data check, data entry, descriptive, and analytical data analysis
- Epidata-Analysis for dataset restructuring, descriptive and analytical data analysis
- Epi-Collect for building questionnaires, remote data entry, mapping, and data visualization
- Epidata-Entry for building questionnaires, data check, data entry, and data validation
ABA Account-holder name: Sokchea YAN
ABA Account number: 002 996 999
ABA QR Code:
or tap on link below to send payment:
https://pay.ababank.com/iT3dMbNKCJhp7Hgz6
✌ Have a nice day!!! 💞
Comments
Post a Comment